Ram Sethu – The bridge under shallow waters

Adam's Bridge a.k.a Ram Setu both meaning "Rama’s Bridge" in India, is a chain of limestone shoals between the islands of Mannar and Ramesharam. There is enough geological evidence to indicate that this bridge acted as former land connection between India and Srilanka. The bridge consists of a series of parallel ledges of sandstone and conglomeration, that is hard at the surface and grows coarse and soft as it descends to sandy banks. In the 19th century, there were two prevalent theories explaining the structure. One considered it to be formed by a process of accretion and rising of the land, while the other surmised that it was formed by the breaking away of Sri Lanka from the Indian subcontinent.

The Project
First conceptualized in 1860 and finally after fourteen proposals and 144 years, the Indian govt. approved a multi-million dollar project which is called the ‘Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project’. The purpose of the project is to create a shipping channel across the straight. The plan is to dredge the shallow ocean floor to create enough leeway allowing ships to pass through the channel instead of having to go around Sri Lanka.

What is the Issue?
Though there are arguments for and against the project – which have their own merits, there are various fundamental issues which are not yet addressed by the government.

Arguments for the project include boosting international trade by saving nearly 30 hours' shipping time by cutting over 400 km off the shipping voyage (as the ships don’t have to go around Sri Lanka anymore). Since the government is unable to prove any real benefits, its argument primarily centers on just a single point – a perceived future economic boost and strengthening the Indian Navy. Considering the cost of the project, which is a whooping 2600 crores, it seems a bit premature with to go ahead with so many unknowns.

Arguments against the project also give us some real issues to think about. The opposition against the project voices concerns related to its impact on the environment and damage that will be caused by dredging the area. Also, potential loss of Thorium deposits and increased risk of damage due to future Tsunamis is something that cannot be overlooked. The opponents, of which, there are many also claim that it will cause tremendous damage to the local ecology, marine wealth and affect the livelihoods of the fishing communities along the coasts of southern India and Sri Lanka. Besides, they say, no one is quite sure where the Indian government will put all that sand and silt it digs up.

The Religious Angle
There are millions who believe that the Ram Setu was actually the bridge built by Lord Ram with the help of Hanuman and his friends using floating stones and Rama’s army marched over this bridge to destroy the evil regime of Ravana. Apart from the Ramayana, the Mahabharata also refers to the continued protection of Nala Setu following Lord Rama's command. Kalidasa's Raghuvamsham also refers to the Setu. So does the Skanda Purana (III 1.2.1-114), the Vishnu Purana (IV 4.40-49), the Agni Purana (V-XI), the Brahma Purana (138.1-40). No one can doubt the religious significance that Ram Setu has in Hinduism.

Picture Taken by NASA

The Political Angle
The Centre has told the Supreme Court that while filing an affidavit, that there is no evidence to prove the existence of characters or events in the Ramayana and the Ram Sethu is not a man-made structure. The govt took a stand that since it is only a natural formation, it could be demolished and the canal can be built. This sparked off a controversy of mammoth proportions as the Center was seen questioning the existence of Lord Ram. DMK’s chiefs comments that Ram did/never existed made this worse embarrassing the government and pitted the rest of the country against TN.

The UPA been unable to convince the anti-Sethusamudram groups on any count. Its assurances and denials and justifications have only made matters worse. At the same time, since it needs the support of the DMK, it is trying to pacify one and all. In the recent days, the matter took an uglier turn when DMK activists attacked the TN BJP headquarters and injured BJP party men. The Congress for its part is trying to distance itself from the DMK and its statements.

Whether it was a natural formation or really built by Lord Ram one will never know and one can never prove otherwise, but either ways the Ram Setu is undoubtedly considered by millions to be a part of Indian heritage and preserving it should be on the mind of every Indian. While even the Christians and Muslims in India have never questioned it, it is sad to see our politicians making a mockery out of it.

Given below are statements made by our politicians.

Karunanidhi: "Some say there was a person over 17 lakh years ago. His name was Ram. Do not touch the bridge (Ram Sethu) constructed by him... From which engineering college did he graduate? Is there any proof of this?"

Vilas Vedanti: “Fatwa against Karunanidhi”

Rajnath Singh: ``Given the manner in which the relationship between the Congress and the Left Front is increasingly getting strained, it clearly indicates that Lok Sabha elections are no longer far away,’’

Jayanti Natarajan: "The BJP is in the midst of an existential crisis. The lotus is wilting. They are not just downwardly mobile, they are in an irreversible decline”

One thing is clear, the common man is not being heard.